Now Showing: 9,319 Artists | 63,292 Events

The Concert Hotwire™

Like Pollstar on Facebook Facebook | Follow Pollstar on Twitter Twitter | Help / FAQ | Send Feedback
Average Ticket Prices
Judas Priest $51.01      Chris Isaak $46.52      Steve Earle $39.46      Janet Jackson $92.69      Straight No Chaser $38.38      Jack's Mannequin $29.21      Jason Aldean $35.00      Snoop Dogg $39.78      B.B. King $56.24      Def Leppard $51.07      Steve Miller Band $49.65      "Winter Jam" $10.00      Indigo Girls $37.74      Mike Epps $51.37      Bassnectar $31.66      MercyMe $11.78      Sugarland $47.19      We Came As Romans $18.27      Lucinda Williams $36.22      Keith Urban $56.17      Mystic Roots Band $14.31      James Taylor $65.80      Pink Floyd Experience $32.49      Paper Diamond $16.23      Taylor Swift $71.54      "So You Think You Can Dance" $53.92      Zac Brown Band $44.98      Backstreet Boys $66.85      Cirque du Soleil - "Alegria" $62.73      Selena Gomez & The Scene $39.19      Flogging Molly $29.80      Iration $14.33      Jeff Beck $62.93      Willie Nelson $51.66      STS9 $33.94      Badfish - Trib. to Sublime $17.69      Queensrÿche $31.60      Cake $35.23      Tim McGraw $43.09      The Script $30.95      Taj Mahal $36.44      Jeff Dunham $48.20      Panic! At The Disco $25.17      Old 97's $21.35      Papadosio $13.16      Eric Johnson $28.35      "Weird Al" Yankovic $33.14      She Wants Revenge $24.22      Enrique Iglesias $69.82      Rihanna $69.76      
See all average ticket prices

Live Nation, Ticketmaster Begin Defending Merger

02:02 AM, Wednesday 2/11/09 7 |   |

Concert promoter Live Nation Inc. and ticketing giant Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. confirmed their merger plans Tuesday and got right to work addressing antitrust concerns that have taken center stage.

Ticketmaster Chairman Barry Diller, to be chairman of the new company — which would be called Live Nation Entertainment — sought to dispel the notion that the deal would lead to higher ticket prices.

"Ticketmaster does not set prices. Live Nation does not set ticket prices. Artists set the prices," he said, without mentioning the ticket surcharges Ticketmaster relies on for much of its revenue.

Under the deal announced Tuesday, Ticketmaster shareholders would receive 1.384 shares of Live Nation stock for each share of Ticketmaster they hold. Ticketmaster shareholders would hold 50.01 percent of the new company, while Live Nation shareholders would have 49.99 percent. Live Nation Chief Executive Michael Rapino would be the new company's CEO.

The companies estimated the value of the combined business at $2.5 billion and said the deal would help them save about $40 million annually. Assuming it gets approval by antitrust authorities, the companies hope to complete the merger in the second half of the year.

Live Nation and Ticketmaster argue that together they could better withstand the recession, sell more tickets and improve service to fans by bringing together their expertise in promotions and ticketing.

However, the merger comes just as Ticketmaster is under fire for recently redirecting people buying tickets to a Bruce Springsteen show from its regular Web site to its reselling subsidiary, TicketsNow. That site had more expensive seats above face value, even though face-value tickets were still available. New Jersey's attorney general launched an investigation, and a class-action lawsuit in Ontario claims Ticketmaster made a similar up-selling move in November for a Smashing Pumpkins concert.

Diller blamed the Springsteen incident on a "technical glitch" by a credit card company, and said the Canadian lawsuit was "without merit."

"They are just chasing cars down the road," he said.

Ticketmaster had already apologized for the Springsteen episode, but the fallout remains. Springsteen recently posted a statement on his Web site saying the merger between Ticketmaster and Live Nation could end up "returning us to a near-monopoly situation in music ticketing."

And Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., released a statement Tuesday opposing the merger, calling the Springsteen ticketing debacle a "bait-and-switch" scam.

"It is very hard to trust Ticketmaster," said the senator, a member of the Judiciary Committee. "This merger would give a giant, new entity unrivaled power over concertgoers and the prices they pay to see their favorite artists and bands."

Diller accused Schumer of making statements that were "factually untrue."

Analysts believe the Ticketmaster-Live Nation combination could lower some ticket prices because the two companies could present a united front to artists when negotiating business deals surrounding tours. The companies are also seeking to fill more seats in venues that are going empty.

Ticketmaster sells tickets for more than 80 percent of the major arenas and stadiums in the U.S., according to concert tracking firm Pollstar. Live Nation is the world's No. 1 concert promoter and owns more than 140 venues. It has comprehensive rights deals covering the tours of such artists as Madonna, Jay-Z, U2 and Shakira.

In January, Live Nation launched its own ticketing service. That brought it and Ticketmaster closer to an all-out scramble for ticketing deals.

Now, Diller said Tuesday, the tough economy has increased the urgency to put the companies together.

"I have been trying and mostly consistently failing to put these companies together for many years now," he said. "Now is the time to do this."

After the Grammy Awards ended Sunday, Neil Portnow, president of the National Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences, took a balanced view of the deal.

"I think it's not a black and white issue," he said. "Music's had a tough time obviously. So to the extent that there can be some efficiencies and you can run a better business, that's something that we have to look at as something pragmatic. On the other hand, the question becomes, `Does this create too much authority and power and control under one roof?'"

Irving Azoff, Ticketmaster's CEO, who would be executive chairman of the new company, told analysts on a conference call that other artist promoters would be given a fair shake in dealing with the new entity.

"We think that it will be a more level playing field, and there's no real barrier of entry for anybody to expand their promotion areas," said Azoff, the longtime manager of the Eagles. "The goal of this company is going to be to get more artists to work and fill more venues and fill more seats."

Live Nation shares fell 30 cents, or 5.7 percent, to $4.99 in afternoon trading Tuesday, while Ticketmaster shares dipped 27 cents, or 4.1 percent, to $6.30.

Both companies are well below their 52-week highs: $18.75 for Live Nation and $27 for Ticketmaster.

7 Comments leave a comment

  1. 138
    Hannibal_Lecter wrote:

    06:53 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    Why do tickets purchased online have so many fees?

    I'm not talking about promoters, venues and artists tacking on fees.  Instead, I'm asking why, compared to online commerce in general, why are tickets purchased online NOT a money saver?

    Amazon, Buy.com - name your own favorite online store, and prices are competitive if not cheaper than you'll find in brick & mortar stores.

    But tickets?  An inventory that doesn't actually occupy any physical shelf space, should offer some savings.  But we're not seeing it.

    I doubt this merger will bring any real reduction in prices.  Same old, same old.

  2. 3
    RB2vox wrote:

    07:52 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    Saying Live Nation does not set prices is an out and out lie!  They offer inflated guarantees to artists in order to prevent independent promoters from landing a show.  That results in a higher ticket price.  Also sounds like a monopolistic practice, hmm?  Sure the artist could decline the extra money, but not many are likely to turn down money once it is offerred.  As the promoter and often venue owner, Live Nation can not honestly say they don't have an effect on prices by deciding how much profit they want to make on the show.  Or are they saying they're a non-profit entity?  Saying this COULD lower prices by removing the middle man is true, but do we believe it WILL?  The answer for me is an emphatic "NO!"

  3. 8
    the Raven wrote:

    08:25 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    what a great deal!  they claim " the deal would help them save about $40 million annually."

    that equates to laying off probably about 800 - 1000 people

    good for the BIG guys, bad for the regular guys

    ultimately " it's all about the fans" yeh right

    it's all about the bucks

    I agree, why isn't on line cheaper?

    what if other industries followed the ticket industry model

    we would all be in deep ( fill in the appropriate noun )

    let's say you went to a gas station

    only to find that all of todays gas supply had been purchased

    but....LOL you could still fill up on GAS.NOW by paying scalper

    prices for your gas

    I hope this merger gets turned down by the federal trade commission

    as the Raven, I say "nevermore".

  4. 104
    gutlessgrl wrote:

    08:48 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    i really don*t understand how live nation & ticketmaster merging will help us consumers - it seems that live nation mentioned they would present all-inclusive ticket prices once they were their own operation but we didn*t see that happen ... now, yet again, it is mentioned that ticket surcharges will be included showing an upfront, bottom line price before we hit the purchase button ... hmmm - i guess we shall see ...

  5. 112
    leona wrote:

    10:12 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    Regardless what others say, positive or negative, we are still a nation of free enterprise.

  6. 15
    Darling01 wrote:

    11:13 AM, Feb 11, 2009

    Take a wild guess as to why its called a "convenience" fee.  You don't even HAVE to pay TM fees.  Go to the box office directly if you want the cheapest fees or in some cases no fees at all (depending on the venue).  Or if you want reduced fees, get in your car and drive to a TM outlet and pay with cash.  That way you pay minimal fees.  Sure it sucks having to pay anything extra for any purchase...but guess what you DO pay more from online merchandisers.  You pay state taxes and shipping rates which depending on the company and merchandise can be astronomical.  It's all about where an how you buy it.  Take a bottle of water.  Get it from the tap...its free.  Get it from the grocery store...its way cheaper but worth it.  Purchase it at a retailer say like Macy's or Dillard's and you pay an outrageous amount for it.  However since you're there...its CONVENIENT.  

    And Hannibal?  Sure tickets are bought online easily by the purchaser...but with the exception of the print at home method...who do you think manages, prints, and mails the tickets?  SOMEONE has to be paid to be there to take care of online orders don't they?  Someone has to be paid to handle the insurmountable quantity of people always looking to exchange, refund, or in anyway tweak their orders.  Would it be better if online ordering was handled through the box office directly?  Where it could take days to process your order due to under staffing?  The bottom line is that when more convenience is involved to the paying customer, no matter what the industry is, it in one way or another is indeed going to cost you more.  And yes even on Amazon.com.  (Though I am fond of the Super Saver Shipping program but its a little pick and choosy so I usually end up just going to a store lol! )

  7. 13
    SneakyPete wrote:

    05:25 PM, Feb 11, 2009

    LiveNation owns national venues. Ticketmaster sells tickets to these venues. The merger of these two companies into Live Nation Entertainment will benefit only share holders of these two companies, not bands or consumers, the ones who really create the supply and demand.  

    By owning both venues and ticketing, Live Nation Entertainment will have unprecedented leverage to influence ticketing pricing (which they will say the artists control) and black-list any artist that tries to play in venues outside of their national network. Artists will be forced to work under Live Nation Entertainment’s rules or set up their own regional or national tours by contracting with independent promoters and venues in every city on the tour (remember Pearl Jam in 90’s anyone). Most bands won’t bother and some will even sign exclusive agreements with Live Nation Entertainment (already happening) so they get a guaranteed return before any tickets are sold (providing Live Nation Entertainment with even more incentive to increase the ticket price in primary market as well as sell at an even higher premium through secondary market, TicketsNow, which they already control).

    Convenience fees are fine but they should be a fixed cost to cover ticket providers’ expenses and provide some profit margin. However, the cost of servicing an order should not change based on the ticket price and should not be paid as a % of ticket price. For example, if an artist (or the artist as directed by promoter…yes they have influence if you want to play their national venues and take their guarantee) wants to charge $20 vs. $100 for the ticket, why should the ticketing service fee change?  It costs Ticketmaster and LiveNation same price to service Madonna at MSG as it does My Morning Jacket as MSG. Yet, service charges for Madonna are a % of a higher ticket price and thus higher to consumer. The ticketing service isn't taking a loss on the lower priced ticket.

    Additionally, ticket services didn't invest in online infrastructure to raise their costs and lower their margins. They did it to lower their operational costs (less people needed to sell same or more number of tickets) and increase margin yet there is no savings passed along to consumer.



Artists Mentioned in this article