Now Showing: 9,319 Artists | 63,292 Events

The Concert Hotwire™

Like Pollstar on Facebook Facebook | Follow Pollstar on Twitter Twitter | Help / FAQ | Send Feedback
Average Ticket Prices
Collie Buddz $21.37      Galactic $24.75      Marc Broussard $21.17      Furthur $52.42      Barry Manilow $110.76      Mac Miller $19.47      Duran Duran $69.31      Steely Dan $69.48      Mat Kearney $19.02      Yellowcard $21.95      Fitz And The Tantrums $20.52      Bright Eyes $29.05      Sting $92.43      Lil Wayne $79.78      Styx $37.28      Katy Perry $42.93      Cage The Elephant $21.38      Bob Seger & The Silver Bullet Band $71.22      The Moody Blues $62.40      Cut Copy $27.00      Béla Fleck & The Flecktones $34.58      Lady Gaga $96.77      Blood On The Dance Floor $12.78      Brett Dennen $22.13      Heart $52.84      André Rieu $75.82      John Hiatt $53.37      Primus $37.53      Jon Anderson $50.32      Goo Goo Dolls $37.40      Train $42.00      Here Come The Mummies $20.31      Yanni $69.38      Sublime With Rome $30.62      Roger Daltrey $78.37      Kid Rock $46.27      Merle Haggard $54.54      Rodney Carrington $47.84      Brad Paisley $41.83      Ray LaMontagne $42.97      Colin Hay $27.36      Third Day $29.09      Sheryl Crow $67.89      Earth, Wind & Fire $53.41      Kris Kristofferson $58.67      The Airborne Toxic Event $20.40      Tony Bennett $84.92      Jason Bonham's Led Zeppelin Experience $35.91      311 $30.90      Phish $53.90      
See all average ticket prices

Promoter Speaks Out About Artists Boycotting Arizona

03:01 PM, Friday 6/25/10 13 |   |

Independent promoter Charlie Levy, owner of Phoenix-based Stateside Presents, doesn’t think artists should boycott Arizona because they’re unhappy with the state’s new immigration law. Instead, he thinks they’re missing an opportunity to speak out against the controversial legislation. The following is an opinion piece Levy submitted to Pollstar. The words and opinions are his own and offer a perspective from a concert industry professional.

As a political activist and 15-year independent concert promoter in Arizona, I feel a deep obligation to speak out about the real-world effects of artists boycotting the state in protest of SB 1070, the recent anti-immigration bill passed by the Legislature and signed into law by our (unelected) governor.

While I respect the intentions of the artists protesting what they find to be an unjust law, the practical effect of the boycott is resulting in exactly the opposite of their good-willed intentions.

By not performing in Arizona, artists are harming the very people and places that foster free speech and the open exchange of ideas that serve to counter the closed-mindedness recently displayed by the new law.

The people who will feel the negative effects of the boycott the deepest are local concert venues, including non-profit art-house theatres, independent promoters, fans and the people employed in the local music business. If the boycott continues, it is all but guaranteed that some of these venues will be forced to close their doors.

Think of it this way: What if otherwise outspoken and inspirational activists like Martin Luther King Jr. had turned their backs on the state of Alabama and its citizens because they didn't agree with the discriminatory practices of its government during the critical years of the civil-rights movement? What would have happened if they had chosen to boycott Alabama rather than speak out, organize and effect change?

We are faced with a similar situation in Arizona today. The legislators currently in office don't care if outspoken artists boycott the state. The people responsible for SB 1070 don't want you here. They don't want your voices heard. And as a result of the boycott, they are the only ones who benefit.

In effect, the decision to boycott is playing right into their hands. As Curtis McCrary, the general manager of the non-profit Rialto Theatre in Tucson, recently stated, "The individuals and organizations behind this bill are . . . more than likely delighted about the prospect of politically vocal artists canceling shows - silencing themselves rather than using the platform their status as artists gives them to speak out against SB 1070”

The truth is, a boycott is an easy gesture that doesn't require much more than a statement and removing a date from your tour schedule. However, if you truly care about the effects of the controversial immigration law that was passed, this is an opportunity to use your unique position as an artist with the ability to reach thousands of people to inspire, educate and motivate your fans to actively be a part of the change.

I have felt and seen the effects of what artists can do to change peoples' lives individually and as a whole. In this important midterm election year, it is imperative that voters are organized and prepared to express their views about the recent law at the voting booths in November.

Every concert venue and promoter in the state would be happy to help coordinate voter-registration drives and set up information booths in connection with concerts. Many of us are already planning specific events, including rallies and concerts, designed to educate and encourage local music lovers to get involved at this crucial time.

This open letter is a call out to all artists to come take a stand and perform in Arizona. We need you now more than ever.

Click here for the Stateside Presents website.

13 Comments leave a comment

  1. 1
    pimpdaddyjake wrote:

    04:16 PM, Jun 25, 2010

    He is right! This is a stupid  up law that, we from Arizona don't agree with. These artists think we voted this law in. That is not the case. The way this got passed is they got the law on the ballot but we would have had to vote against it for it not to go in to effect. And we never knew about it so we could'nt say no to something we didn't know was there. Just another fine example of our fine government at it's best. Cypress hill canceled their show in my town of Tucson, Az. I had tickets to that show. I was a really big fan before this but i have to say i am really disappointed That they hurt their fans by not showing up to "Rise up" against this bill. That is the name of thier new cd. They said that is why they canceled the show. I will never look at them the same. They dont even bother looking deeper into the issue and realize thier fans are the ones hurt by this bill. Now lets punish them by not showing up! Good plan! And now rage against the machine has started the sound strike to boycott Arizona and not play there!  What happened to the days of showing up and rallying against the issiue. Flobots did that excat thing. The day of their show here they showed up to a ralley and used their voice to help fight this law. I just hope more folllow this pattern and Rise up.

    One sad music fan calling for help!!!

  2. 33
    wildthing wrote:

    05:26 PM, Jun 25, 2010

    I understand the opinion of the promoter and understand the opinion of the comments from the first poster here. Have to comment on the promoter stating that Martin Luther King would not have turned his back on Alabama.  No, he would not have done such a thing, but have to question, and ask,  wasn't the State of Arizona one of the states that was against honoring Martin Luther King"s Birthday.  Senator John McCain was one who voted against the creation of a holiday to honor Dr. King.   McCain did later change his opinion, as it was unfavorable with the majority.  Just hope you people can figure it out.  Desert weather temperatures must be affecting the elected officials thinking over there.

  3. 120
    ahhhhhh wrote:

    08:37 PM, Jun 25, 2010

    Artists should play the shows they promise fans. Shows should be a place to escape from politics and the world all together. Period.

  4. 27
    Cro~Mag1070 wrote:

    07:23 AM, Jun 26, 2010

    This promoter can suck ass, all he cares about is money like most business people and not whats best for the state. So far NOBODY has canceled that is relevant or that I care to see yet. So far the only ones are out of date nobodies like  bullshit hall and oats and cypress hill. Further more I don't give a *** about the opinion of people who do not live in Arizona as they are not citizens of the state they have no real opinion. Arizona is becoming a beacon of light and will lead the nation in the right direction and into the future, more and more states are coming on board with Arizona.  Viva los 1070, Viva La Migra.

  5. 633
    Studebaker Hawk wrote:

    07:30 AM, Jun 26, 2010

     I live in FL but think its really stupid for bands to let politics come between them and their fans. It will make them lose some fans. I would of thought people so into music like Joe Satriani would not have joined this but I guess he's more foolish than I thought.

  6. 829
    DeltaSigChi4 wrote:

    02:57 PM, Jun 26, 2010

    I live in Nevada, and used to visit Arizona quite often, but will BOYCOTT the entire state for the rest of the lifespan of this racist and unjust bill. And I will continue to support all artists who boycott that racist and backwards state as well. Boycotts worked during the civil rights movement of the 1960's; maybe Mr. Levy needs to reread a few history books.

    E

  7. 27
    Cro~Mag1070 wrote:

    03:10 PM, Jun 26, 2010

    Deltasig, thank you for not coming. We don't need anymore retards here as we already have plenty of dumbocRATS. This fine and just law was drafted by a constitutional law professor and will stand in court. By the way, Arizona is 3-0 in immigration lawsuits.

  8. 103
    Saturdaynightspecial wrote:

    04:33 PM, Jun 26, 2010

    If you have to tell a bunch of trend jumping musicians to play for their fans it's a lost cause.

    Lets start boycotting states for archane laws like no spitting on the sidewalk or something,lets boycott Ca. for Nancy Pelsoi being an anti military criminal, or Nevada,for Harry Reid who is a criminal.& sold endangered wetlands to developers.

    I hate to see an industry web-page each,dilluted to the point of Rolling Stone Magazine-a far left rag,but it's headed there-each  state should have the right to govern themselves as they see fit- The Illegal problem is something someone should've (Any president R or D) addressed @ any point over the last say 40 years!

    our economy is on it's death bed- because of cheap foreign labor & cheap illegal domestic labor.

  9. 829
    DeltaSigChi4 wrote:

    01:13 AM, Jun 27, 2010

    Dearest Cro~Mag1070,

    You have a grand total of two (2) posts in the lifespan of your pollstar®, both being in this article's comment area. This leads me to believe one thing: troll. And while I enjoy a good troll just like everyone else on the internets, I only have a certain amount of patience with Republitrolls. We'll see what the United States Supreme Court has to say about this, chap. Make sure you launder your robe.

    E

  10. 1
    ARIZONAVETERAN wrote:

    07:08 AM, Jun 27, 2010

    As  SOLDIER who has served in Iraq I believe our country must fight racism and any law that leaves the door open to bigotry. Trust me there is a way to secure our borders without being racist.

    All the hatred spewed is quite offensive. I come from a family where we lost 3 uncles in World War II to Hitler's hate.

    We are Americans. We fought the fuhrer and his ilk back then and continue to do so everywhere.

  11. 27
    Cro~Mag1070 wrote:

    10:04 AM, Jun 27, 2010

    Delata, I have other comments under a different name, I changed it so I could add 1070 to it. Your one of many who is against something you never read, had you or anyone else who is against it actually read the law you would know it makes no room for racial profiling. Go ahead and keep calling everyone you and others like you disagree with a racist or nazi and those words will have the same impact as calling someone pudding!

  12. 2
    floorlizard wrote:

    02:59 PM, Jul 02, 2010

    Isn't it ironic that these same "artists" that are so up in arms about a soverign state exercising it's Constitutional right to secure it's borders (since the federal government isn't following its OWN laws to do it) would probably sue me if I were to ignore the copyright and legal borders that THEY THEMSELVES put on their "art". What would happen if I downloaded Mr. Oberst's music, printed up my own CD's and covers with MY name on it and sold it as MY art? Mr, Obert's lawyers would be so far up my a$$ that they would be peering through my ears....